:: MAY 26, 2004
Board backs compromise in Renaissance Zone
Residents dissatisfied, Developer Eyde happy; Council must decide
The Lansing Planning Board supports the Benavides administration’s
“compromise” agreement with Sam Eyde to develop property
in the Renaissance Zone, but residents are fighting it.
Daniel Sturm/City Pulse
Tagger, 422 S. Butler Blvd., stands on developer Sam Eyde’s
nearly one-square-block site next to the new Hall of Justice. It
is bordered by Butler on the east, Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard
on the west, Kalamazoo Street on the south and Washtenaw Street
on the north.
In a 6
to 0 vote on May 18, the board approved a proposal to sell an additional
20,000-square-foot lot to Eyde for a small mixed-use project of mostly
commercial space. In return for carrying out this project, which would
include some office space, the deadline would be removed for Eyde to
develop a much larger adjacent piece of land that Eyde bought from the
city in 1999. Eyde wants to build mostly office space on the larger
property, while residents want a mixed-use development that would include
stores and residences.
The final decision rests in the hands of City Council. Eyde said he
was happy with the agreement. He called the proposed construction of
a smaller mixed-use facility a “favor to the city.” He said
he doesn’t have any tenants for this building and would have to
Ron Whitmore, a member of the Renaissance Neighborhood Association,
said the city administration was “exerting considerable pressure
to move this forward.” He said that neighborhood groups would
make sure that City Council members were well informed.
“City Council still has to approve it,” he said. “They
have the power.”
Planning Board members also unanimously recommended that City Council
require Eyde to complete the smaller project if the sale is approved.
Eyde’s Seven Block Development LLC has not fulfilled its original
contract to complete a three-story, 150,000-square-foot office building
on a large vacant property southwest of the Capitol.
Renaissance Zone residents were disappointed by the “compromise
agreement,” presented by James Ruff, the city’s director
of planning and neighborhood development. In letters to the city signed
by the Seven Block Citizens’ District Council and the Renaissance,
Westside and Downtown neighborhood associations, residents criticized
the proposed sale of additional land.
The biggest concern was that Eyde will no longer be obliged to meet
any deadlines for the adjacent four-acre site, whose completion is already
three years behind schedule.
Residents also argue that a small amount of retail next to a large site
of vacant property is unlikely to succeed due to a lack of traffic.
“This arrangement would reward and give preferential treatment
to a delinquent developer and delay the original four-acre development
indefinitely,” the Citizens’ District Council said in a
letter sent to the City’s Planning Board on April 27.
The groups encouraged the city to revise the plan to include mixed-use
development throughout the entire site. They urged the city to enforce
its agreement with Eyde, by requiring the company to break ground immediately.
Otherwise, the city should repossess the land, the community groups
When Eyde said economic conditions were no longer favorable for meeting
the original 2001 deadline, City Council approved an extension on developing
the site until 2004, and then granted a further extension until 2006.
With an estimated 25 percent downtown office vacancy rate, planning
officials said that it wouldn’t make sense to add further office
space. Eyde has refused to consider other types of development for the
larger property, choosing insead to leave the property vacant. They
argue that the undeveloped area is a blight for the community and that
they know of other developers with ideas for mixed-use development.
At last week’s meeting, three of the planning board’s six
members expressed concerns about the fact that the neighborhood groups
unanimously opposed the agreement between the city and Eyde (a “compromise”
in which residents had little say). Board member John P. Ruge suggested
the city take back the property and find a new developer, because Eyde
had broken his promise and the neighborhood had lost trust in the developer.
Ruff said he didn’t want to “fluff over” residents’
concerns but defended the compromise, arguing that Mayor Tony Benavides’
office had instructed him to resolve remaining problems with the developer
“in good faith.” He said that taking the property back would
only lead to a lengthy legal fight.
Planning Board Chairwoman Sissi P. Foster insisted that the city should
include some kind of “performance condition” in its new
sale agreement with Eyde, so that if nothing happens within five years
the agreement can be annulled.
Realizing that the board appeared undecided whether it should push for
certain conditions, board member Carlton McConnell asked Eyde, who silently
listened from a seat at the front of the chamber, whether the adoption
of performance conditions would negatively impact his project plans.
Eyde replied that any conditions would be a “hindrance.”
The developer gave the impression that such measures were unnecessary
and that they placed his integrity in question.
Eyde blamed the project’s failure in part on the unwelcoming environment
he said the existence of a small party store at Butler and Kalamazoo
Streets had created in the neighborhood. It sat on the only part of
one square city block of property that the developer does not yet own.
The city tore it down after selling the larger site to Eyde.
Whitmore said Eyde was wrong to blame any part of the project’s
failure on the party store because he knew about its existence when
he signed the original agreement in 1999. Whitmore said there had been
very few problems associated with the corner store.
to respond? Send letters to firstname.lastname@example.org.
our Letters policy.